Our offices will close for the holiday period from 5.00pm Thursday 23 December 2021 and reopen at 8.30am on Thursday 13 January 2022. For urgent matters during this time, please contact Katrina Hammon on 021 221 8847, or Andrew Watkins on 021 905 506.
Thank you for your support in 2021 and we wish you all the best for the new year.
Noho ora mai
By: Josh Taylor, Rebecca Saunders
The NBR has recently published two articles on two cases currently before the courts (Decmil NZ and Downey Construction) relating to the retention regime under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (Act).

The retentions regime under the Act continues to be a fraught area, with industry players complying with the regime to varying degrees (in some cases not at all).

The theory of the regime is simple: money withheld as retentions should be held as liquid assets (or other permitted alternatives) and proper accounting records should be kept to track of which parties are owed retentions and how much those parties are owed. The aim is to ring fence the retentions for the benefit of the retention creditors in the event of insolvency.

This theory has been difficult to apply in practice, with many of the concerns well-documented. In our view, one of the key issues is the fact that a deemed trust over retention monies can only be created if proper accounting records are kept. This, coupled with no penalties or personal liability for directors in the Act, creates a limited incentive for compliance.

In a post-Covid environment we are likely to see insolvency issues in the already under pressure construction industry increase and it is crucial that the legislature amends the regime to protect the parties owed retentions.

There is some hope as changes to the legislative regime have been signalled by Minister Jenny Salesa.  The proposed changes will:
  • introduce a new offence and penalties for company directors and firms who don’t comply with their responsibilities,
  • strengthen how retention money is held to prevent firms from dipping in to retention money to use as working capital,
  • require those holding retention money to issue a transparency statement stating how much is being held and where.

The proposed changes are outlined at https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/govt-delivers-security-construction-subcontractors

These changes will go a long way to reducing the issues with the current regime. If you have questions about how to comply with the current retention regime or want to make sure that your retentions are held in accordance with the Act then contact our team.

The NBR articles referred to above are available here:


Download this article in PDF format
Share this page on social media:

Enter security code:
 Security code


Wynn Williams Client Toolkit

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with stylesheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so. The latest version of Firefox, Safari or Google Chrome will work best if you're after a new browser.